RTS 1 once again omits Ousmane Sonko from broadcast, decision sparks outrage

The decision by Senegal’s public broadcaster RTS 1 to skip live coverage of the constitutional revision session has triggered strong reactions on social media. As users denounce a controversial editorial strategy, the debate over media treatment of institutions intensifies in Senegal.

Media coverage of the constitutional revision continues to fuel discussion in Senegal. On Monday, June 29, 2026, public channel RTS 1 once again faced criticism for deciding not to broadcast the plenary session dedicated to reviewing Bill No. 17/2026 on constitutional reform.

This absence of live coverage immediately fueled reactions online, where many commentators condemned what they see as a selective, even politically motivated editorial choice. On X (formerly Twitter), comments multiplied within minutes of the parliamentary session starting.

Some users expressed confusion over the decision. Others view it as a tactic to sideline certain political figures from public debate, particularly regarding the visibility given to statements involving Ousmane Sonko in institutional media coverage.

The account Maps Cissé merely posted: ‘Plenary session – Examination of Bill No. 17/2026 on constitutional revision,’ without any corresponding television broadcast on the public channel. This observation quickly ignited reactions.

On social media, comments ranged from resignation to open criticism. Some users said ‘this is no longer a surprise,’ while others condemned what they see as a trivialization of media coverage of such institutional events. Messages citing a ‘predictable decision,’ ‘disappointment,’ and ‘ongoing confusion’ over the public broadcaster’s role appeared throughout.