In his latest political editorial aired on Radio Tiémeni Siantou (90.5 FM in Yaoundé and Bafang), commentator Eric Boniface Tchouakeu questions whether President Paul Biya’s extended European stay raises constitutional concerns.

The President of Cameroon left the country on June 7, 2026, for what authorities described as a “short private stay” in Europe, according to a statement from his Cabinet Director, Samuel Mvondo Ayolo.

While official sources insist the trip remains private, persistent rumors about the President’s health—despite repeated reassurances—have fueled speculation. Some observers now openly question whether Cameroon is experiencing a power vacuum.

However, constitutional experts clarify that Cameroon’s presidency cannot be considered vacant based solely on the President’s absence abroad. The country’s fundamental law does not impose any time limit on presidential trips overseas.

A vacancy can only be declared under three strictly defined circumstances: death, resignation, or permanent incapacity of the sitting President. Notably, the constitution provides no clear definition of “permanent incapacity,” leaving this determination open to interpretation.

Therefore, the current debate about a potential power vacuum lacks legal foundation. President Biya could theoretically govern remotely from abroad without violating any constitutional provisions.

The real issue may stem from political ethics rather than legality. The delayed formation of government following the October 12, 2025 presidential election—and the rushed reinstatement of the Vice-President position—could explain why some citizens are now tracking the President’s days abroad with unusual intensity.

After more than 43 years in power, President Biya has never issued a major decree from abroad, suggesting his absence may be more significant than official statements indicate.